Louisiana's new Science Education Act, July 2008

"Digest: Provides that proposed law shall be known as the "Louisiana Science Education Act."

Proposed law requires BESE, upon request of a local school board, to allow and assist teachers, principals, and other school administrators to create and foster an environment within public elementary and secondary schools that promotes critical thinking skills, logical analysis, and open and objective discussion of scientific theories being studied including evolution, the origins of life, global warming, and human cloning.

Provides that such assistance shall include support and guidance for teachers regarding effective ways to help students understand, analyze, critique, and objectively review such scientific theories being studied.

Provides that a teacher shall teach material presented in the standard textbook supplied by the school system and thereafter may use textbooks and other instructional materials to help students understand, analyze, critique, and review scientific theories in an objective manner, as permitted by the local school board.

Provides that proposed law shall not be construed to promote any religious doctrine, promote discrimination for or against a particular set of religious beliefs, or promote discrimination for or against religion or nonreligion.

Requires BESE and local school boards to promulgate rules and regulations necessary to implement this Act prior to the beginning of the 2008-2009 school year."
___________________________________________________________________

It is a shame that the government should have to pass an Act in order to require this kind of activity to be allowed. It's something that happens in laboratories, colleges, and businesses everyday.

When Einstein applied his Theory of Relativity to the structure of the universe, he found that it predicted either an expanding or contracting universe--something entirely incompatible with the prevailing notion of a static universe at the time. Later Einstein added a term called the "cosmological constant" to his equations so they would make his calculations consistent with a static universe.

He changed his Theory to fit the prevailing scientific thought of his day! A Scientist by the name of Edwin Hubble decided to "understand, analyze, critique, and objectively review" the structure of the universe, and found that it was not static! In 1929, Einstein admitted his mistake.

How many Edwin Hubbles are sitting in classrooms today, that will be encouraged by this Act to understand, analyze, critique, and objectively review, the knowledge they are being presented with in the classroom? Or how many will find a way to alter the information to fit what they are being taught based on the prevailing scientific beliefs?

Unfortunately, there are those who are threatened by this Act. They don't want schoolchildren thinking for themselves, questioning what they are being taught. They want to be able to shove whatever they want into the minds of our kids.

Who are these people?

-The American Association for the Advancement of Science. AAAS CEO Alan Leshner warned that the bill would "unleash an assault against scientific integrity, leaving students confused about science and unprepared to excel in a modern workforce."
-The ACLU says it will be keeping a close eye on a bill called the Louisiana Science Education Act should it become law.
-The Louisiana Coalition for Science
-Atheist Revolution

What if they were around in 1929 - would they be trying to silence Hubble, or perhaps prevent him from doing his research, or asking his questions? I'm sure there were many scientists who were quite comfortable believing in a static universe, and had their lives shaken by Hubble's results.

Give me the Edwin Hubbles in the classrooms, they're the ones that will make a difference in the world.

Lisa Garza, Food Network is NOT your friend.

From Bob Tuschman's Food Network Blog: "Lisa ...... started out strong: the very cute “mom” side of her emerged and she was down to earth and twinkly. But when Rachael came on strong to move the segment along, Lisa just shut down. Rachael couldn't’t relate to the sophisticated food she created for her Girl Scout."

Huh? What Food Network showed on their site, and what Rachel Ray shows on her site, give completely different views of what happened. Lisa did great, and Rachel Ray seemed to be having a good time too!

After seeing this, and realizing how Food Network duped me into thinking Lisa screwed up, I'm about ready to blacklist their station from my remote. I wasn't rooting for Lisa, as she came across as stuck-up. But I'm beginning to change my mind. Maybe I've been voting for the wrong person! What a dilemma. Maybe I'll start voting for my least favorite, because Food Network doesn't deserve her.

Personally, I think Lisa should take this as an omen, and even if she does win a show on Food Network, she should get out of it, and look elsewhere. Follow in the footsteps of TFNS alum, Nathan Lyon.

Unfortunately, Food Network once again shows me that their attempt at a reality show fails, and I won't tune in next year. The fix is in, and it's even more obvious this year than in the past.

Be more authoritive, less authoritive, but more authoritive. What?

Show Six. Rachel Ray and the Brownies Challenge. Bob Tuschman tells Kelsey she needs to take more authority, but when she does on the Rachel Ray show, he criticizes her.

What's it going to be, Bob? Is this a glimpse on how you run Food Network, too?

Week 1: "Do a show on taro root."
Week 2: "Why did you do a show on taro root? I ought to fire you!"

I wonder how many of your employees are taking Prozac or Valium?

Kelsy got Rachel involved in what was going on, instead of Rachel standing around talking the whole time. Oh, wait. Isn't Rachel Food Network's golden goose?

IMHO, Rachel Ray has been overexposed. I'm getting weary of seeing her, like, everywhere.